Health fund fails to account for 30bn/-
The House Public Accounts Committee  (PAC) has meanwhile denied Lindi regional leaders an audience and sent  them packing after their failure to explain loss of over 200m/- in  public funds.
POAC Deputy  Chairman Deo Filikunjombe explained that his committee reviewed a report  by the Controller and Auditor General and discovered that it was  failure by NHIF to observe the law that was behind the massive loss.
He said the  fund had bought or otherwise procured a number of items without caring  to follow laid down guidelines.
Giving  examples, the MP said the fund engaged the services of security  personnel and bought oil without announcing any tender, thus occasioning  loss running into billions of shillings.
“Our committee was shocked on discovering  that public procurement has been done without following the country’s  laws and regulations, which are very clear,” he noted, adding that was  taxpayers’ money and not money from NHIF coffers.
“This is a matter of grave concern over  which our committee cannot remain silent. 
                Today we have observed this;  what about tomorrow?” remarked a visibly upset Filikunjombe.
“The explanation the NHIF Director has  given us contradicts the CAG’s report, which suggests that the fund is  not doing its job as expected. We want the money back and safe for the  benefit of public, and not otherwise,” he added.
He said the  committee had reviewed the CAG’s report and thereafter instructed NHIF  to work on the problem discovered to ensure that they did not recur,  adding: “We directed that, for purposes of transparency and ensuring  that there was no conflict of interests, the fund’s director general  should not be a member of the team of auditors because is the one who  had done the audit under dispute in the first place.”
The committee  further directed NHIF to do whatever it would take to  minimise running costs, “and bring to us the fund’s annual procurement  report at our next meeting for more clarification”.
A member of the  committee, Kangi Lugola, said violations of the legislation on public  procurement were an indication that corruption and favouritism were  rampant or endemic.
            He said it was  unacceptable for the fund to be fond of seeking loopholes through which  to enter into “emergency procurement transactions when the law clearly  prohibits such things”.
NHIF Director  General Emmanuel Humba defended himself, submitting that they were faced  with a shortage of personnel “and one of our procurement professional  quit and getting a replacement took very long” and adding that oil  adulteration had contributed to the loss discovered.
In follow-up  remarks, NHIF Board Chairman Ally Kiwenge commended the committee “for  their constructive comments” and promised to work on the problems cited  without delay.
“It would be unfair to expect the committee  to say we are doing a good job when there are many problem areas. This  should serve as part of a learning process,” he said.
Meanwhile, PAC  Chairman John Cheyo led his team in sending away Lindi regional leaders  who had come to Dar es Salaam for a meeting with the committee on their  2010/2011 revenue and expenditure.
After the  discovery of the 200m/- loss, he declared: “Sorry, colleagues, there is  no need for the committee to waste time listening to these people. Let’s  go straight on to our agenda.”
              Cheyo then  started going through the Lindi report while shaking his head in  apparent shock and disbelief, and later stopped going through it and  ordered them “get out and head back to home”.
He said the  report showed that hefty amounts of money had been spent without  detailed explanation or valid supporting documents, noting: “We are not  here to waste time discussing such a hopeless report.”
Responding to  earlier queries by the committee, acting Lindi regional administrative  secretary Thomas Soum blamed the mess on a former “officer in charge of  funds” he said things had since been transferred to Manyara Region.
Cheyo later  promised to write a letter to the relevant authorities “strongly  recommending” the immediate demotion of the officer referred to – and a  second letter, to the Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office  (Regional Administration and Local Government) – “so that the officer’s  salary is subjected to a 15 per cent deduction”. 
No comments:
Post a Comment